Global Scamming

June 14, 2009

I have been quite convinced for some time now that this whole “global warming” phenomenon is part of a scam from the Left wing of American politics. The whole thing really took off around the time Al Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth came out. (The fact that he won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work with the IPCC is immensely disturbing.) The American Left, along with their friends in the MSM, have been able to convince us that we are somehow responsible for a shift in global climate change.

Every year, people around the globe invest in billions of dollars into “green” products. How did the Greens (the term for these environmentalist whackos from Paul Johnson’s article) accomplish this? They used a different kind of green: money. The Greens, predominately made up of the liberal elite, have convinced the rest of America (and the world at large) to invest in the “environmentally-friendly” programs that they run. They have bullied us into buying “green”: green appliances, green cars, and green shopping bags. It is a myth that “going green” will have a significant effect on Earth’s climate. In fact, many of these so-called green items do more to harm the environment than help it. (Check out Ellen Gamerman of WSJ’s “An Inconvenient Bag”.)
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not anti-environment, but I am anti-global warming propaganda. I do not deny that climate change exists, but I refute the notion that it is man-made and thus we are mandated (note the pun) to somehow put a stop to it. The actual science behind global warming is shaky at best. You can’t tell me there is proof when there is scientific evidence showing the exact opposite. The scary thing is that global warming has become both a science and a religion for these environmentalist nutjobs. Eminent British historian and author Paul Johnson articulates it well in his column “The Nonsense of Global Warming”:

The idea that human beings have changed and are changing the basic climate system of the Earth through their industrial activities and burning of fossil fuels–the essence of the Greens’ theory of global warming–has about as much basis in science as Marxism and Freudianism. Global warming, like Marxism, is a political theory of actions, demanding compliance with its rules. Those who buy in to global warming wish to drastically curb human economic and industrial activities, regardless of the consequences for people, especially the poor. If the theory’s conclusions are accepted and agreed upon, the destructive results will be felt most severely in those states that adhere to the rule of law and will observe restrictions most faithfully. The global warming activists’ target is the U.S. If America is driven to accept crippling restraints on its economy it will rapidly become unable to shoulder its burdens as the world’s sole superpower and ultimate defender of human freedoms. We shall all suffer, however, as progress falters and then ceases and living standards decline.

With many more real problems worldwide, it is such a tragedy that we have been suckered into this global warming scam. Environmental waste is a problem, but buying off your “carbon footprint” is not the solution. I should give credit to the liberals for coming up with such an ingenious idea: Make every day Earth Day and make everyone else pay for it. In all likeliness, we will use up our oil supplies and run out of food, as a result of these eco-friendly projects, before the Earth ignites into a giant fireball. Now that’s the inconvenient truth.


Article(s):
Top Ten ‘Global-Warming’ Myths
The Nonsense of Global Warming
Global warming — myth, threat or opportunity?

I’m Not PC, I’m a Mac

June 13, 2009

Nine times out of ten, the term “politically correct” is used in a satire form. But the scary thing is that the use of political correctness (PC) as a tool of restricting free speech (and free thought) is a reality. It is a reality based upon cultural Marxism: that everything is related to the power struggle between the classes. PC has been adopted by the American Left and is used to intimidate people they don’t agree with. Look at what happened to Don Imus.

I’m not saying you shouldn’t be careful of what you say based upon the circumstances because there can be repercussions. My point is that you shouldn’t be AFRAID to say certain things. Someone will always take offense to something said. Does that mean you should verbally walk on eggshells your entire life? Constantly worrying about offending someone’s race, gender, religion, culture, sexual orientation, (fill in the blank), is the real crime. Jacques Barzun once said, “Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred.” Political correctness is not about teaching tolerance of “otherness,” it’s about teaching ignorance about the “oneness” of human nature.

I see people as individuals, not as members of groups. That is not to say I do not make generalized comments about groups of people, because I do. But what I say is not targeted to an individual member of said group, it’s about the party or culture as a (socially-constructed) whole. Just a few questions, I’ve been pondering…

Why is it wrong for me to use the term “fag”? Answer: because I’m not a member of that “group.” Why is it wrong for people to use the term “colored people” and “Negro” today when organizations such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and United Negro College Fund (UNCF) still exist? Is the term Asian offensive? Some say yes because it groups all Asian nations into a unified term; some say no because it groups all Asian nations into a unified term.

This is just a glimpse into the way I look at the world (in a totally non-PC kind of way). So as you continue reading my blog, be aware that I will probably offend you in some way. It’s not that I don’t care, it’s that I do. I care about free speech and I care about humanity (spambots aside).



- extraordinarIAN



Writer’s note: My name is Ian Mac (from MacPhail, which is Scottish.) That’s why the title is ironic (if you’ve seen Apple’s “PC vs. Mac” commercials). I shouldn’t need to explain these things, but just in case you didn’t know.


iPhone Lover

June 11, 2009

I absolutely love my iPhone. In some respects, I am an Apple fanboy. However, I do not think the iPhone (like the Mac computer) is for everyone. The best thing about it is the overall UI (user interface). It’s so pretty! Everything about it from running applications to merging phone calls is beautifully designed and executed. The worst thing about the iPhone is the required AT&T contract. At least in Boston, AT&T phone service sucks. I don’t even get service in parts of the Emerson campus!

There are definitely aspects of most smartphones that the iPhone has been missing (like video and MMS), but the new iPhone 3GS and OS 3.0 have made many improvements. And I know the phone is very much still in development. I hesitate in even calling it a “phone” as it’s not so much a phone as it is a media platform/mobile computer.



My Top Ten Must-Have (Free!) Apps:

    1) TwitterFon – Best free Twitter client.

    2) Facebook – If you feel the need to stalk your friends when you’re away from a computer.

    3) Skype – Talk to other Skype users for free over wi-fi or call anyone in the world for a small fee.

    4) Evernote – The mobile version that syncs with your online account to help you “remember everything.”

    5) The Weather Channel - Current weather forecast with radar tracker and video updates.

    6) CardStar – Never carry another store membership card again with this fully-scannable barcode generator.

    7) Urbanspoon – A fun way to shake for restaurant suggestions in your area.

    8) Zenbe Lists – A great, simple to-do list maker that syncs with an online account.

    9) Backgrounds – Never get bored with these really cool designs to use as your iPhone wallpaper.

    10) WordPress – A must-have for the avid blogger on-the-go.



(This post was written with the WordPress app on my iPhone to demonstrate its awesomeness.)



- extraordinarIAN


Open Up Your Chakra

June 11, 2009

The other day I had my first Reiki treatment. Reiki is a simple technique, but it is part of a more complicated lifestyle. It is neither massage nor mediation, but a combination of the two. The main thing to know is that it is a Japanese technique used for stress reduction, relaxation, and healing.

My neighbor took some classes and has been offering free treatments to family and friends so that she could practice. I decided to give it a shot, not knowing what it really was about, with an open-mind. The experience was quite interesting to say the least. Basically what happens is that you lie on a table (with your clothes on) and the practitioner places her/his hands on/over different parts of your body. She focused on each of the 12 areas for about five minutes. I kept my eyes closed and ears tuned into the trippy, New Age music. She told me it was fine if I fell asleep, but I really wanted to stay awake to see what I would feel.

What I felt surprised me immensely. Minutes after the first position (hands over eyes and face), my head cleared up. I am not exaggerating this. I was relatively stressed the whole morning and, as usual, I had some much going on inside my head. Nevertheless, I could feel the pressure released and pleasant thoughts filled my mind. I started daydreaming of green pastures and waterfalls. (No joke.) As the treatment continued, my muscles started to loosen up. By the time the hour was up, there was a tingly sensation pulsating throughout my body. I walked around my house feeling light as air. The sensation continued for the larger part of my day. Reiki is my new friend and I will do it again.

I have started to research the philosophy and practice behind Reiki, but reading about chakras, auras, meridians and symbols are making my head spin. According to this website, the “root chakra” is located “between genitals and anus.” Ummm… All I can say is my first treatment was not focused on that area. Maybe that’s next time.


Holy Cow, Delicious Cheeseburger

June 10, 2009

I don’t have a problem with vegetarianism, but vegetarians often have a problem with me. I am an unabashed, meat-eater. When it comes to meat, the redder the better. I believe humans were designed to eat meat, whether it is cows or chickens. I don’t have a problem with eating healthy, but I also believe meat is an important part of a healthy diet. Meat, especially lean meats, are a high source of protein, iron, zinc, and B-12 vitamins.

Given the obvious nutritional benefits of eating meat, why do people become vegetarians? The ones I have talked to say they have become vegetarians either because of health reasons or because of “animal rights,” and sometimes it’s both. Vegetarians are part of a cow-worshiping cult, like Hindus without their religious practices. However, those are not the ones I mind so much. The vegetarians I have a bone to pick with are the ones who actively campaign to get others to join their cause. I’m not going to stop eating meat because someone showed me pictures of cattle being slaughtered or chickens being cooped. I feel as though some people become vegetarians to start arguments. The top point on their political agenda is to make people feel bad about themselves. That’s one kind of politics I don’t want to talk about over the dinner table. You can have the salad; just give me the cheeseburger.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.